Friday, September 22, 2006

No. No. And Thrice No.

A bit late to the party today, but non-the-fucking-less an opportunity to good to miss...

The Times reports that:

"Hazel Blears, the party chairman, told The Times yesterday that Labour, as the party of government, should get more public money to support political work."

I'll throw some money into the pot if we're buying rope for you and your entire pestilential, gibbering calvalcade of simpering, sidestepping, immoral, stealing, theiving twats. Aside from that, you can put my diseased, unwashed cock in your mouth and await my watery seed (and it will be a long wait - but it will arrive before my money). You have no claim on my money. None. Not a single penny of mine is yours by any measure of right or justice. If you're bankrupt, you can get to the nearest street corner and whore yourself. You can sell advertising space on your cheeks. You can sell some of the acorns you've no doubt got stored up at the bottom of the garden.

What you cannot do - in this universe or the next - is take my money that I have earnt, through my skills and talent and time, that I worked to bring home to better my family and my life, and spend how I see fit. Through automation and coercion, you take more than your fair slice as it is. What democracy is this when my money is taken from me to be spent on "political work" that I don't agree with? That a mere 22% of the population as a whole voted for at the last opportunity? Who are you Blears, to demand my money? What is your authority to take what is mine by right? In any other sphere of life, this would be called theft. My Allah take your hands. Tell me to which authority I can appeal? Who will redress my pleas? A fucking ombudsman? Ermine akimbo? I think fucking not..

This will head to the barricades sooner than you think.

6 Comments:

Blogger Frank P said...

I hereby reserve a space beside you on the barricades. But I hear no general clamour against Blear's outrageous suggestion (not to mention similar begging bollocks by other 'political' pygmies of other 'parties'). One is forced to believe that the Great Unwashed is ripe for plucking ... again! Perhaps they believe that it would decrease corruption rather than transmogrifying institutionalised corruption into legalised extortion. The barricades may therefore be seriously undermanned. I despair of a vast swathe of my compatriots. I suppose the fact that at least '22%' of them voted for Blair on three occasions should have been a clear signal of endemic madness amongst our countrymen/wimmin.

3:42 AM  
Blogger Frank P said...

I would like to revise my opinion about possible numbers on the barricades; having just read The Devil's Kitchen link (which I should have done before commenting) perhaps we would we be in more and better company than I anticipated. I'll be in touch if Blear's project moves any nearer to becoming a concrete proposal.

3:57 AM  
Blogger Reactionary Snob said...

Leagues ahead as ever, Carpsio. Quite sickening really.

RS

4:46 AM  
Blogger Frank P said...

Carpsio

It's OT, I know, but I must get your reaction to this:

http://www.rantburg.com/poparticle.php?ID=166706&D=2006-09-23&SO=&HC=1

Hat tip Dan Collins on Bloody Scott.

10:23 AM  
Blogger furriskey said...

I'm afraid we have to wait for Mr Murdoch to decide he has had enough of new Labour.

5:35 AM  
Blogger Chalcedon said...

The Labour party should only get money from it's usual coterie of deranged providers, the trade unions who will later call in favours (how democratic is that?)..............oh bollox. Why don't they just sell peerages openly and have done with it.

5:16 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home